2026-01-17 04:36:09

Worth examining how different projects structure creator incentives. Take the case of $SAN backing MycelialOracle—the fee mechanism now channels earnings directly to the founder, which differs notably from their previous project. That earlier token $FOREST hit a $73m ATH, but the creator royalty structure wasn't built in then. The new model with $SAN shows how tokenomics design can evolve to better align founder rewards from day one. It's a practical example of how fee distribution matters when building sustainable crypto ecosystems.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

22 Likes

Reward
22
8
Repost
Share

Comment

Add a comment

LadderToolGuy

· 01-19 21:23

Haha, finally someone explained this logic clearly. I really didn't see this coming with the $FOREST wave before.

View OriginalReply0

WalletWhisperer

· 01-19 16:53

ngl the $SAN vs $FOREST trajectory is textbook wealth extraction pattern recognition... founder probably running the numbers on wallet clustering behaviors before pulling the lever on tokenomics v2

Reply0

CryptoPhoenix

· 01-17 20:42

Nirvana rebirth is never just talk, and this wave of $SAN design truly shows some real ideas. Back when $FOREST couldn't even lock in the founders with $73m, now $SAN has incorporated incentives right from day one... This is the opportunity we've been waiting for!

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeSobber

· 01-17 05:05

Hey, finally someone remembers that creators also need to eat.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropBuffet

· 01-17 05:02

This time, the $SAN model is indeed clever, as it incentivizes the founders right from the start, unlike $FOREST which was a bit confused back then.

View OriginalReply0

BlockchainGriller

· 01-17 04:58

NGL, this is the right way. The opportunity missed with $FOREST before has been made up for this time with $SAN.

View OriginalReply0

LightningClicker

· 01-17 04:44

Haha, $SAN has truly understood this time. They directly incorporated founder incentives into the mechanism, unlike $FOREST which was remedial after the fact.

View OriginalReply0

DefiSecurityGuard

· 01-17 04:37

ngl, holding $SAN but that fee mechanism routing straight to founder wallet? classic centralization red flag. DYOR on the contract code before yoloing in—seen this structure precede rugpulls too many times this cycle alone. not financial advice, but verify the smart contract audit first, yeah?

Reply0