2026-01-18 19:35:58

The Promise vs Reality of Web3 Financial Freedom

Here's the thing: as long as assets remain siloed on individual blockchains, the web3 narrative of financial liberation rings hollow. Users still face significant friction when moving value between chains. Until true seamless interoperability becomes the default—not the exception—web3 continues to sell a dream it hasn't yet delivered. The infrastructure simply isn't there yet.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

13 Likes

Reward
13
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

MissingSats

· 12h ago

To be honest, the cross-chain experience is really the Achilles' heel of Web3; every transfer feels like gambling.

View OriginalReply0

InscriptionGriller

· 23h ago

To put it simply, this is the biggest joke in Web3—boasting about seamless cross-chain integration every day, but in reality, transferring a coin can get stuck for half a day, and the transaction fees are ridiculously high. When it comes down to users, the true nature is exposed, yet they still dare to claim financial freedom. First, get the infrastructure in order, and stop just harvesting expectations with PPTs.

View OriginalReply0

FadCatcher

· 01-18 20:05

Cross-chain is still the biggest challenge. Talk about freedom first, get the infrastructure right before boasting.

View OriginalReply0

degenwhisperer

· 01-18 20:01

Is cross-chain liquidity just like this? Feels like it's still just a pie in the sky.

View OriginalReply0

ZeroRushCaptain

· 01-18 19:49

Uh... claiming financial freedom before cross-chain liquidity is even established, isn't that what I heard before I bottomed out last year? And the result? Halved.

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-cff9c776

· 01-18 19:36

Oh no, it's that old topic of "cross-chain freedom" again, with the supply and demand curves all skewed. Really, Web3 right now is like a Van Gogh—crazy innovation but can't sell at all because the infrastructure's floor price is still on the ground. But according to Buffett's logic, this kind of friction cost is actually the best filtering mechanism, and the retail investors should be stuck. Isn't this just another form of DAO governance, using technical barriers to achieve natural selection?

View OriginalReply0