Analysts state that the four-year Bitcoin cycle remains intact; the bottom may occur in October 2026. Despite recent volatility and debates about whether the traditional Bitcoin halving-driven four-year cycle is experiencing disruptions, some analysts remain confident that the cycle is fully intact. The pattern—sharp surges after halving followed by 50-80% declines—continues to align with historical data, with the latest correction from the peak reinforcing rather than contradicting it. Reports from companies like Kaiko highlight that the decline to current levels reflects previous bear phases, not structural changes. Some projections suggest that the cycle bottom may be reached around October 2026, with the bear market expected to persist throughout most of the year before the next accumulation phase. This outlook provides reassurance to long-term holders: despite short-term pain from macro factors ( oil shocks, the strength of the dollar ) is real, and the supply dynamics of the halving cycle remain a key driver. Traders should watch for signs of capitulation or stabilization around key support levels as the cycle approaches the anticipated bottom. #GateFebruaryTransparencyReport #MicroStrategyAddsBTCFor1.28B

4/4 Double Bottom Evening Analysis Main Direction: Night trading is weak and volatile, following BTC fluctuations, avoid aggressive chasing ✅ Short-term bullish reference Entry: 2080–2060 in batches Target: 2040–2020 Stop Loss: 2090 ✅ Long-term bullish reference (light position on oversold conditions) Entry: 2100–2090 with stabilization Target: around 2050 (quick take profit, avoid holding through resistance )) Technical Logic: 1. 4-hour Bollinger Bands opening downward, moving averages in a bearish alignment, dominated by bears, resistance on rebounds. 2. The area 2080–2100 is a multiple intraday resistance zone, insufficient volume to break through. 3. The area 2020–2030 provides double support, night trading prone to spikes, wait for stabilization before entering, avoid bottom fishing. 4. During Qingming late night, liquidity is extremely low, volatility is high, false breakouts are common, total position ≤20%, single trade ≤10%. 📌 Macro Rhythm Non-farm payrolls reinforce high interest rate expectations, CPI approaching, market fear index at 31, funds are cautious, no clear trend, only trading within ranges, quick in and out. #加密市场行情震荡 #三月非农数据来袭 #Eth

I just came across one of those polarizing stories from Bitcoin history that keeps reminding me how wild the early days of the crypto world were. Mircea Popescu—this name is still present in the community today, even though most people only know him from discussions about the most toxic moments in the Bitcoin debate. Popescu was Romanian, a Bitcoin billionaire, and the founder of MPEx, one of the early crypto exchanges. But he wasn’t just a successful trader or investor—he was one of the most controversial figures the Bitcoin community has ever seen. An extreme Bitcoin maximalist who had no patience for compromises or network upgrades. People remember his threats to crash the price through massive sell-offs if the block size was increased. That wasn’t just an opinion—it was provocative power. What made Mircea Popescu truly unforgettable wasn’t just his technical views but the way he spread them. Aggressive blog posts, trolling, provocations against Bitcoin developers—he almost seemed to aim at dividing the community. Some call him the father of "Bitcoin toxicity." And yes, that’s probably fair. Then, in 2014, he drowned off the coast of Costa Rica. 41 years old. And suddenly, his death became the biggest speculation in the crypto world. Popescu held over $2 billion in Bitcoin—but those coins could be lost forever. No instructions, no access for others. That’s one of the darkest ironies: a man with enormous influence on Bitcoin philosophy, whose fortune might remain forever inaccessible. His legacy is complicated. Technical contributions, yes. But also a story full of controversy and provocation. Just as Satoshi Nakamoto sparked an endless quest to uncover his true identity, Mircea Popescu shaped the Bitcoin community in another way—through conflict, polarization, and unwavering beliefs. The mystery surrounding his death and the future of his Bitcoin holdings continues to fascinate the crypto world today. An enigmatic man whose influence is undeniable, but whose legacy will remain forever controversial.