The storage sector has two paths forking right before my eyes. One side has established players with massive scale and heavy-duty technology. The other side features emerging community-driven solutions. I've decided to shift part of my position from the former to the latter.

To be honest, it's not about airdrops.

Where's the difference between these two players? One is like a traditional enterprise-grade cloud storage company — feature-rich, with clean accounting, but it feels like there's a wall between it and regular users. The other is different; it's more like a cooperative we're all building together. The scale might not be as explosive, but every participant has a voice.

To sum it up in one sentence: one is "their network," the other is working to become "our protocol."

The former competes on hard strength — technical accumulation and storage capacity. The latter contests on soft strength — authentic on-chain consensus and actual usability. This isn't just about volume; it's about power distribution.

At $0.14, I see this price as a vote — a vote for "a storage network truly governed by the community." Decentralization should never be just a thesis written in labs and by capital. It should start from the moment each person uploads their first file and receives their first voting right.

That's why I'm willing to bear this risk.